Kamis, 19 April 2012

Indian Railways, Its Budget, and Aam Admi's Travel

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Railway Minister Dinesh Trivedi presented his budget where in he proposed to raise rail fares across all classes. Safety as recommended by the Anil Kakodkar Committee was the main focus area. The budget, as many did say, was very bold. The financial health of Indian Railways has not been very good since over the past decade there has not been any increase in fares. On the other hand, costs have gone up significantly.

Indian Railways has become a toy in the hands of the politicians that they use for their own benefit. During last one decade, there has been mushroom growth of new passenger trains on an already insufficient rail infrastructure in the country. During last five years, addition of more than five hundred new trains, increasing the frequency of trains and adding more coaches per train has left Indian Railways in a tight spot. Today, IR needs spare capacity. Such a massive addition of passenger trains every year without any serious thought, mainly on political consideration, has severe implications on safety preparedness of railways. Further, neither any system or mechanism exists to evaluate safety risk of such uncoordinated measures nor has any effort been undertaken to ameliorate the worsening conditions created by such an act.

The proposed investment on safety as per the High Level Safety Review Committee for five years is more than 1 lakh crores. Indian Railways needs to improve its finances in order to implement those recommendations.

Indian Railways transports more than 20 million passengers and 2 million tons of freight on a daily basis. It has a network that is spread across the length and breadth of our country comprising close to 65,000 route kilometers. More than that, it has a strong workforce of close to 1.4 million employees. Therefore we cannot ignore the needs of this organization for a protracted period of time.

Today, IR enjoys less than 12% market share of India's total passenger traffic. To improve on this front, there are several other measures that need to be taken such as separation of passenger and freight businesses, discourage short-distance passenger, reduce travel time, increase service speed, and reduce train stops. It also needs to work on problem-free ticketing and reservation, improve its safety, security, and hygiene standards. It has to improve on reliability with timely arrival and departure of its trains to repose faith.

Those who oppose the fare hike should also realize that today's common man is not that common and demands better service too.

Hello, my name is Rajendra Sureshchandra Kulkarni. I like to write about politics and current affairs. I write on any interesting, serious or controversial issues that deserve to be written and analyzed. Being apolitical, I try to be unbiased and honest about what I write. Please pay visit to my website: rajendrak-hottopic.blogspot


View the original article here

Awareness Is Important to Vote for the Right Government

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

A government is responsible for the well being of its people. Voting is an important right and people should exercise it wisely. Ensuring that they pick the right candidate is the wisest decision that they can make. The roles and the responsibilities on which they base this decision should include providing the three basic needs that is proper food, adequate living space and clothes at no cost. The fulfillment of these basic responsibilities helps to build a trust between the government and its people. It's also helps people decide if the government has fulfilled its responsibility and if they should receive the vote during the next elections.

A government should be open and transparent in their functioning. In a democracy, the government is responsible for the tax payer's money and should be held accountable at all times. Ensuring that the money is wisely spent is important. Transparency will also help to build trust between the government and the people. When a government plans and lets the people know about all the different challenges that they will be facing together it establishes a proper communication with its electorate. It's imperative that people are aware of these decisions and vote for a government that can hold up to this level of expectation.

One of the most important qualities that's required for good governance is experience and honesty. Most governments fall because they lose the trust of their people and are only hungry for power. There are political forums that exist online today that are capable of providing all the right information about the election and detailed candidate information. This kind of information can help to generate the necessary awareness. It ultimately helps people decide the right candidate who deserves their vote. These websites also provide details about the past records and performance of the candidates and measures their contribution to public development and welfare.

Based on such information, voters can vote for the right candidate. Some politicians tend to manipulate people into believing that they are the suitable candidates to win the elections. But it's important to be aware of such people. Instead of listening to election speeches and coming to a conclusion, people should refer to political forums and get their facts about election candidate's right. One of the things that these political forums do is ensure that they spread political awareness and keep people updated about current elections. You can also discuss about candidates and election trends on such forums.

Governments turn corrupt because there is always a lack of information amongst people. People, who are the main victims of corruption, need to share the injustice that they have faced through the right channels. One of the most important channels that are capable of bringing change today is the media. The media has the most wide spread network and it includes radio, television, news papers and the internet. With the help of all these modes of communications, taking a decision on choosing the right candidate will never be a problem. It's all about being aware and ensuring a safer future.

J Viller is the author of this article on Opinion.
Find more information on Event here.


View the original article here

What the Etch A Sketch Really Reveals

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

While Mitt Romney continues his limp toward the Republican nomination, his Etch A Sketch moment has revealed and even deeper and more fundamental flaw in his campaign strategy.

While there is a part of me that is pained to see a favorite childhood toy become a political metaphor, it shows that his campaign ultimately sees this election as less about the mettle and personal characteristics of the candidate and much more about the environment in which he is running. Hence, the example used by Romney's senior campaign advisor Eric Fehrnstrom. In his mind, it was an apt example of the way they see the world, they keep drawing pictures to please the audience and they can simply clear it away and move onto the next drawing, because in the end this election is not about the candidates rather about the conditions in which this campaign is taking place.

A tough economy, high gas-prices, rampant unemployment, lackluster approval ratings, ask any student of politics and they would say this doesn't bode well for the incumbent President. The mistake of this mindset it that it ignores the human nature of most voters-they want to vote for a candidate and not against them.

This fallacy pervades much of partisan politics and will certainly undermine Romney with the conservative wing of the Republican Party. While many primary voters continue to pull the lever for Rick Santorum in his increasing quixotic bid for the nomination, they say they will support the eventual nominee even if it is Romney. The truth is that while some may do it, many will not be motivated to go to the polls and their lack of enthusiasm will pervade the race at every turn.

Which brings us back to Romey's Etch a Sketch strategy for the fall. The campaign seems to believe that by simply pointing out how bad things are, they do not have to present a candidate who actually gives people something to get excited about. Shake it up, start over, and try a new design-loads of fun for an eight-year-old in the 70's and not the way to electoral success in 2012.

All this brings us back to the issue everyone keeps talking about and to which the Romney campaign seems impervious-Mitt keeps redesigning himself with no more solidity then the sand on the screen. Who is this man? What does he really stand for? Is he passionate about anything other than making money and continuing his father's political lineage?

My guess is that like so many heir apparents their life, while blessed by money and position, has done little to support an understanding of who they truly are and what they really care about. Romney's campaign has brought this into stark relief and the only perplexing piece is why it has done little to bring about any introspection on his part. Which explains the strategy if they can't give people any solidity on what they are voting for let's get them to vote against the opponent.

Sadly, this tactic rarely works and that is the good news; despite all we are faced with in the world today, our human spirit is touched more by the desire to believe in, then it is to fight against. No, this won't be true for everyone this November and I am confident that it will be enough to see President Obama re-elected.

Let's hope in Romney's doomed strategy that perhaps he finds the courage to speak his own voice. While it won't assuage the right-wing, it may give him some small satisfaction that the past few years have produced at least some positive impact. And in knowing that many will be going to the polls this November is search of something better, let us hope that President Obama gets the message and the courage to actually bring his visions into reality instead of building them on shifting sands.

Kathleen Schafer is at the forefront of leadership development with more than 20 years experience. Grounded in the rough and tumble world of politics, experienced in business, honed in academia and broadened by her own journey to create a balanced life, she brings remarkable insights on how individuals can develop their leadership potential to successfully create productive and fulfilling lives. Kathleen's personal presence in one-on-one coaching, seminars, and keynote presentations transforms people's perspective on what they can accomplish and how to walk it in the real world everyday. Her leadership tools are simple, easy to understand allow you to quickly integrate them into your life, starting now!

If you are interested in creating change in your life, your organization or your community, please visit http://www.leadershipconnection.net/ for additional resources, podcasts, on-line courses, and tools to start your leadership journey today.


View the original article here

Romney As the GOP Nominee

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

If former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney wins the Republican nomination will lose to Barack Obama in the general election.

Here is a very important point to remember folks. The information that I have tried (and for the most part failed) to share with conservatives is Mitt Romney's record as governor.

I've been called a Mormon bigot, among other things, I am dedicated to pursuing and defending the truth wherever that may lead. And if that means I have to receive hate mail because I am sharing unpleasant yet realistic news, then so bet it.

I make a political prediction below based on my analysis of each state's voting history, demographics, and to a lesser degree, some polling information. Of course predictions are shaky at best, especially in the political arena, but I'm confident with my electoral vote count conclusion below.

Here is a guarantee: if Romney wins the nomination you can be sure that the Obama/Chicago Political Machine will expose everything about Romney's record while Governor of Massachusetts, of course with the help of the mainstream media (MSM). When stalwart conservative Romney supporters see his record was that of a liberal, they well be quite disappointed.

And believe this too, they will vet the Mormon religion in a way we wished they had vetted Obama's Pastor Jeremiah Wright. And the MSM and liberal blog sites will be self-inoculated from religious bigotry charges, a vaccination they do not offer to conservative media outlets.

The bottom line is this: Romney is going to get creamed in the press, on the stump, and in the debates. And you are going to see the type of journalistic objectivity from the likes of the New York Times, Washington Post, the big three news networks, and CNN for which we have been clamoring. Romney's record as governor is so blatantly liberal the MSM will not have to attack Romney, they will simply report his record.

So here is my prediction if Romney wins the GOP nomination:

Obama will beat Romney easily by at least 5 percentage points. I predict Obama will win the following states against Willard: Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, D.C., Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin for a total of 325 electoral votes.

And even if Romney won his "home" states of Massachusetts and Michigan, Obama would still have 298 electoral votes.

You heard it here first folks!

Dave Jeffers
Founder & President
Aletheia Group L.L.C.
http://www.aletheiagroup.org/


View the original article here

The Affordable Health Care Law, Aka ObamaCare, Isn't

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Sometimes I think the US traveled back in a time warp as our government attempts to control and intervene in every aspect of our lives. ObamaCare is a prime example, but if it is allowed to stay then I really fear things to come. For instance, everyone would be required to report everything they eat, how much exercise they do, and this would complete our society as that of the Borg. A nanny state, where the government becomes your parents in adulthood, this you'd just have to accept. Somehow, however, that really doesn't sound like the USA I know. Okay so, let's talk.

There was an interesting piece of propaganda produced by the Pew Research, a Law Firm neo-Liberal Socialist Lobbying Group, on March 26, 2012 titled; "Public Remains Split on Health Care Bill, Opposed to Mandate - Polling on Health Care Reform." It had all sorts of nifty graphics, polls, and such claiming that 47% of the people were for it, and 45% against it. Still, that is irrelevant because it is unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court is to judge this law purely on the constitutional merits, or in this case lack of.

Thus, it doesn't matter what the mindless masses think they want this week on Twitter or Facebook, what matters is the law. Our Supreme Court has a job to do, which isn't legislating socialist reforms or injecting their personal political views, or keeping their high-paid spouses happy who have consulting gigs in the health care industry.

If the Supreme Court will not do its job, may I ask why we need them? The answer is; we don't - let's just turn our country over to the demands of the mob, and their socialist populist savior who continually usurps our constitution. The integrity of the United States system of government, checks and balances, and future are at stake.

The US Citizen for the most part has no idea of all the changes which will take place, nor any clues as to the unintended consequences they will cause regarding this law. To call it; The Affordable Health Care Law is almost criminal in itself, obviously something affordable sounds like a good idea, so of course the ignorant masses would be at least 50% or in this case 47% for it, but those polls by Pew are worthless. First the questions they ask in the poll are leading, secondly, the people don't understand, the population has been snowed by podium pushing politicians.

Apparently, the socialist elitists want to control your entire life from birth to death. Indeed, I hope you will please consider all this and think on it.

Lance Winslow has launched a new provocative eBook on Current US Politics. Lance Winslow is a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the Online Think Tank; http://www.worldthinktank.net/


View the original article here

Freedom or Tyranny

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Nine months out from the most important general election, certainly in my lifetime, and there is still no clear-cut republican nominee at this point. Quite honestly, I am much less concerned about that than I am the blatantly obnoxious attempt of the left-wing media, and by extension, the Obama administration, to determine who our guy is going to be come November. For anyone of even meager intellect to suggest that this is not occurring is laughable. Unfortunately for us all, there are no shortages of those who would doggedly insist there is no "cabal" as such. That's to be expected, I suppose, when the warped and failed ideology that idealistic liberals embrace is apparently more important than the bleak realities that such liberal philosophy presents when taken to its logical conclusion.

Please do not cite the liberal philosopher-king Rousseau to me unless you are ready to see the writings of your progressive champion trashed in his own words. You've read Rousseau? Good for you, I have as well. I have a few words for the blissfully ignorant young communists in this country also. Before one begins touting the virtues of a Leviathanic government as proposed by the delusional Thomas Hobbes, one really should take the time to actually read the words of Hobbes, as well as those of Karl Marx. The Communist Manifesto, co-written with Friedrich Engels, is infamous, incredibly enlightening and, simultaneously very deeply disturbing.

The thing that makes Rousseau particularly annoying to myself and other advocates of Lockean thought, is that in places, Rousseau parrots Locke while espousing the virtues of individual liberty, and then touts the "general will," and ultimately advocates something of a collective philosophy that is much more in line with Marx than Locke. Surely, a man of Rousseau's unsurpassed intelligence understood the inevitable conclusions that result from any form of Statism (be it communism, Marxism, socialism, fascism, etc.). That is the stifling of initiative and incentive, the complete eradication of a "free press," which used to fill the indispensable role of the watch dog of the government in the interest of "the people;" furthermore, statism is a self-defeating prophesy that ends in the utter bankruptcy of entire civilizations both financially and morally.

Rousseau confirms all of this in his own works. To his credit, the philosopher-king of the Left also rightly espoused that indeed, freedom is a tenuous thing that can be gained; however, once lost, freedom is rarely ever regained. These are all basic truths of Rousseauian thought that most of his die-hard fans never seem to cite.

What has any of that got to do with the coming election of 2012, one may ask? I would humbly suggest that it has everything to do with the coming election. When one objectively looks at our current government and considers the implications of a future based on the status quo, it is not hard to recognize that individual liberty and freedom are teetering on the brink of extinction. The collective has regrettably become the focus of seemingly the entire democratic party (somewhat predictably), and even more disturbingly, the collectivists have apparently infiltrated the Republican Party much to the dismay of truly conservative patriots such as myself.

After three years of unbridled spending that far exceeds the total spending of the first 42 administrations combined (even the spending of George W. Bushat the same point in his first term is dwarfed by that of Obama), massive bailouts of Wall Street and the government takeovers of the auto and banking industries; in addition to the government taking control of student loans and almost all home mortgages in this country, is there anything other than the Internet that isn't largely controlled by government? Even that isn't safe now with the emergence of proposed legislation (SOPA and PIPPA), that would surely impose the will of the ever-growing monstrosity that is our nation's capital. The argument of the administration of course is that the proposed legislation would help prevent piracy and other illegal or fraudulent activities originating on the Web. There are existing piracy and copyright laws on the books that only need be enforced to effectively address this non-issue, so why the typical governmental overreach?

Objectively speaking, the preceding paragraph is a pretty damning indictment of the man currently occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, and we haven't even considered the death nail of Obamacare that will most assuredly lead to massive rationing of much needed health care services, lower reimbursement rates for doctors who accept patients on government health care, drastically increased wait times to see a physician, and ultimately the bankruptcy of an entire civilization. This president is taking us down the road to total insolvency. He is indeed taking us the way of the European Union. In true Marxist fashion he is seizing power for the executive branch (my liberal friends, have you considered the implications of this power in the hands of future administrations?), rendering the legislative branch irrelevant, choking out the private sector and investment in this country while crushing any real opportunities for economic growth.

Indeed, freedom is an all too lightly-regarded concept and the exception, not the rule when considering the history of the world. Totalitarianism and brutality are the norm when analyzed in the context of man's history. This is something that unfortunately, our younger generation seems to be somewhat ignorant of. Gulags and internment camps, genocidal rulers and generally nasty and oppressive regimes reveal the end results of absolute power in the hands of corrupt individuals. Despite the clear (and largely successful) attempts of the liberal media and most of the elite of academia to re-write human history with the intent to wrongly and reprehensibly mislead our nation's youth, the facts and historical references still exist. Fortunately, it is all there for any and all to see. I strongly encourage my friends and family to become engaged. After all, Locke tells us that we have not only the right to challenge an out-of-control administration and government, but moreover, a duty to the rest of society as well as our progeny to be vigilant.

These are all realities that our founders in fact warned us all about. The anti-federalists were wary of exactly what we see today in our nation's government. The recent attempt by the Obama administration to mandate that Catholic organizations provide free birth control was, in all honesty, shocking even from these people. Why on earth would our commander in chief insist that religious or faith-based organizations provide needless services (we know now, of course that birth control is readily available, and in fact free in many cases) that blatantly oppose the teachings of their church? This latest attempt of blind tyranny is deeply and fundamentally wrong in a variety of ways. A full-frontal assault on religious freedom and the first amendment of the United States Constitution (the supreme law of the land), in large measure the president's proposal accomplishes multiple objectives of the secular left. For starters, this maneuver of the president and his administration seizes additional power for the monster in Washington while frivolously and irresponsibly spending even more taxpayers' dollars. In addition, this provision of Obamacare would further marginalize people of faith.

As a practicing man of faith (currently without a church home), I can tell you that there is nothing more important to me personally than my family and my faith. Quite obviously, I am not alone in this regard. I will in fact defend both to my dying breath. Those who really know me understand that this is not bluster of any sort. I love my country and fear for it; our grandchildren will inevitably be left to deal with the fallout of this administration, as well as successive administrations. Fundamentally, this is what we all have to comprehend. It is pure fantasy to suggest that future generations will not suffer profoundly from the reprehensible actions of those indeed entrusted with the defense and protection of our civil society and our founding documents, the constitution specifically.

Simply ask yourself how it is that one of the youngest countries on the planet managed to live freely and prosper to the status of the world's last true "super-power" over the last 230 plus years. The constitution that the founders of this country managed to get ratified (a monumental achievement at the time) is the oldest and most enduring written constitution in the history of man. In its conciseness and simplicity, this particular document applies to every individual citizen of this country. As a matter of fact, the constitution has been abused, side-stepped, and ultimately ignored by presidential administrations as far back as Woodrow Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt. Additionally, even Abraham Lincoln usurped power not allocated to the executive branch of the federal government (granted the situation was extreme). This is purely historical fact for my liberal friends who would wrongly and stubbornly insist this is fabrication.

In terms of the upcoming election, it is absolutely critical that we become engaged. I urge all my friends and those I interact with to not "sit this one out." Quite simply, this is the most important election of our lifetime. One has to understand with clarity that danger lies on both sides of the political spectrum when considering the extreme fringes of both parties. One ends in full-blown Marxism, while the other results in something more akin to fascism. Both are elements of the Progressive movement that began in earnest with the Progressive Party as represented by Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson a hundred years or so ago. While the movement largely went underground for several decades, it has reemerged and is obnoxiously raring its ghastly head. Most don't take the time to really listen to this president when he is bemoaning a "do-nothing congress" that exists to resist a power hungry president. Compare his tone to that of Wilson who openly expressed his disdain for the constitution; the similarities are striking.

I will give this administration credit though; candidate Obama pledged that his administration would be the most transparent of our history. While the administration has managed to change the subject as of late in order to distract from the policies enacted by this regime, the cumulative damage done over the last three years could not be more apparent. While both liberal and conservative friends of mine would scratch their heads and suggest that this president is continually working under the radar, indeed trying to obscure and cover the dictatorial agenda being imposed by this man and his throng of blind supporters, I submit that this administration could not be more "transparent." If they are not blind, they are in fact, complicit. I'm not sure which proposition is worse. However, when one considers the body of work of this president and his administration in its entirety in historical and philosophical context, it is not a leap to conclude that these individuals are unapologetically Marxist, in general.

I have heard it said repeatedly during this campaign that the Republicans do not offer a viable alternative to this man and his policies. This is the single most disingenuous claim of the "mainstream media" and the unyielding left. This humble author would suggest that three out of four of the republican candidates vying for the daunting task of righting this dangerously listing ship would be light years better than what we currently have, and in an honest election would handedly defeat Obama. Let it be known that myself and the tens of millions of my fellow conservatives across this beautiful country are awake and indeed, engaged. My black friends are no fans of this president and his policies either, contrary to what many leftists would suggest. These hard-working and patriotic individuals (many of them veterans of our beloved armed forces) clearly see the ongoing threat that is the naked, unparalleled power-grab of an out of control administration bound and determined to control all aspects of the lives of our future generations.

In conclusion, when considering what is truly at stake (no less than man's freedom), consider not just who, but what one is pulling the voting lever for. A society cannot be one of "the collective," and simultaneously champion individual liberty and freedom. We've also heard the term "conservative engineering" thrown around by any number of so-called "journalists" on the left in a desperate effort to scare the electorate. The ironic thing about the last statement is simply that the current powers that be are determined to reengineer this entirely unique and wonderful country into something that resembles the currently crumbling "social democracy" that is the European Union. What's worse is that the media is asleep at the wheel. One can readily go back and reference this president's own words during the 2008 campaign, just days before the election when he said this: "We are days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America, and then the world." This man has held true to those infamous words, quite frankly.

Until now, I have been somewhat undecided in terms of who my choice of Republican candidates for president will ultimately be; however, in the interest of full disclosure, personally, I have always liked Rick Santorum. At this point in the campaign, I will eagerly cast my vote for this man twice, if it were allowed. A champion of free markets and individual freedom (as well as individual responsibility), this father and future grandfather is a patriot and a man of integrity. I believe Santorum to be a sincere man of faith; this characteristic alone gives me great hope that this man will safeguard our constitution, as well as the future of our grandchildren. His economic plan is centered on the private sector (as should be), and indeed the middle class. Tax cuts across the board will be a hallmark of a Santorum administration, allowing for true and robust economic growth and millions of jobs that always result from such policies. The great JFK cut taxes across the board to stimulate a stagnant economy and, surprise, it worked. The policies of Reagan followed in the eighties and resulted in the longest sustained period of economic and job growth that the world has ever seen.

As he so often was, Ronald Wilson Reagan was correct when he said (paraphrasing): "America is freedom's last stand. If we lose freedom here, where will the oppressed go?" Indeed, this wonderful country is the last bastion of man's freedom. I used to wonder in my idealistic youth why it is that tens of millions of immigrants have risked their very lives to get here. The answer to that question is as plain as the nose on one's face. The opportunity afforded in this country is unequalled in the world. The freedoms that we have here are in fact uniquely American. In short, most immigrants will likely tell you that they were fleeing countries terribly lacking in freedom and opportunity. Bear in mind that opposition does not exist in communist societies. Hugo Chavez owns and controls what should be a free-press in Venezuela. As a result, the news coming out of that country is filtered through the government before it goes to print.

All of this is meant to serve as food for thought prior to one making the trip to his or her polling place on November 6, 2012. To be clear, it will take more than one election to fix the massive problems that face us as American citizens. We (the American people) have allowed this to happen, quite frankly; nevertheless, we can save this republic. In order for that to happen, we all need to be more active participants in policing our government and elected leaders. I have witnessed the power of the people locally and our considerable influence when we are galvanized for cause. We came together to face down tyranny in our small community, and we prevailed overwhelmingly. More than anything else, this essay is a call to all American patriots and a humble plea to those who are considering sitting out this election. This is not just about you; we hold in our hands the fate of our grandchildren. Please exercise your God-given right and vote this November. Vote your conscience; moreover, vote for freedom.

My website is currently under construction. I am available for training advice and the like at robthirty06@yahoo.com


View the original article here

Missile Defense and Nuclear Weapons Arsenal, Can We Trust DC to Get It Right - No Way

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

How many nuclear weapons does the United States really need, ask many anti-war activists? Well, perhaps enough to make a large number of nuclear weaponized nations think twice about getting together to take us out using their nukes, one might suppose. Regardless of your beliefs or game theory choices in deciding your opinion or position on this issue - it's an important issue. Okay so, let's talk shall we, as there have been some recent political developments lately.

There was an interesting piece on the CBS News on March 27, 2012 titled; "Obama: I'm not "hiding the ball" on Russia," which addressed another comment he made off the record, not on the microphone, but within ear shot to a couple of reporters anyway, as he stated that he would have more flexibility to deal with nuclear arms reductions after his re-election. Of course, this assumes he will get re-elected, and this voters asks why on Earth would the American People be so foolish to do that again?

If you missed the comment President Obama stated; "This is my last election, after my election I will have more flexibility."

In this second follow up segment on international TV he stated that "missile defense" plans are standing in the way of reducing our nuclear weapons arsenal, and that we'd need to look at that, albeit, after his so-called re-election victory. Meanwhile this same week a great American company Raytheon announced its latest new Patriot Missile system missile defense battery for sale now to American allies in the Middle East. As you know NATO and the US will be building anti-missile systems to protect against Iran, but Russia knows they might be used to shoot down missile from Russia into European nations - of course.

My question is; would it be considered treasonous for a US President to make a deal to reduce our nuclear arsenal and strike capabilities, and also delay the protection of our NATO allies? And do we really want to give that sort of power away or allow a US President to have more flexibility to make Americans less safe? I'd say no, but you might have an alternate view here you see?

Meanwhile, Gingrich and Romney GOP Presidential candidates were also alarmed that Obama would be "making a deal with the devil" behind closed doors or off-mike which was written about in Government Executive news on March 26, 2012 in a piece titled; "Romney, Gingrich blast Obama for missile defense comments," by Sarah Huisenga and Sarah B. Boxer reprinted from the National Journal. The article stated;

"That is an alarming and troubling development," said Romney, calling the president's comment "revealing" for what he called Obama's unwillingness to provide more details about missile defense," and " Gingrich called the exchange with Medvedev an "extraordinary moment caught on tape where the president basically said to a Russian leader, "Please wait until after the election so I can sell out."

Perhaps, you can see the problem here, and you have chosen to opine on one side of this debate or the other. Treasonous is not a term to be used lightly, still, I ask if it belongs or if that label is the correct one. Indeed, I hope you will please consider all this and think on it.

Lance Winslow has launched a new provocative of eBook on 2012 US Politics. Lance Winslow is a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the Online Think Tank; http://www.worldthinktank.net/


View the original article here