Tampilkan postingan dengan label Health. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Health. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 19 April 2012

What Do Health Care and the Mega Millions Lottery Have in Common?

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

As a lifelong student of leadership, I enjoy looking at the events that capture national attention and examining what they say about who we are as a society and how we are leading in our lives.

It seems nothing is as riveting as the Affordable Care Act's three-days at the Supreme Court. The debate over healthcare or as some have dubbed it "Obamacare" has galvanized the nation along its well-know red and blue partisan divisions. How is it that the world's most affluent country, with the most expensive health care system still has a dismal record on health care with tens of millions of people unable to access it?

While I completely conquer with the assessment by Auerback and Wray that health insurance is not synonymous with health care and that a single-payer system, while politically untenable is the more economically sound approach, at its core the health care dispute is at the place where America is stuck on many policy fronts. That is, there is an unresolved tension between what we want for ourselves as individuals and what we want for our community and country.

Some indisputable facts:

• Everyone consumes health care.

• No one knows if they will require a little or a great deal of care or when they will need it.

• When someone needs care they want to get it right away.

• As a society, we have already agreed that anyone who needs care will receive it if they get themselves to an Emergency Room.

• Most people always assume that "bad things" happen to other people until they are the ones faced with chronic illness or a catastrophic accident.

• Untreated sick people can become a threat to public health.

• For most services where there are free riders and when individual access has both personal and community implications (e.g. it is impossible to have an army that only defends a certain portion of the population) the government is the provider because it is the entity that best balances the interests of personal and public without a profit motive.

From the left and the right, health care is in a ditch because of two key factors: on the right the vitriol has become so heated around the interests of the individual that they have dismissed all sense of connection and the inevitable consequence of one person's behavior on another; and on the left, lack of inspired leadership in government has created a bureaucracy of mind-numbing regulations that now hinder one of its central functions of balancing personal and communal needs in a vibrant and responsive way. Take any issue, education, environment, economy they are all stuck because we have polarized the choices to such extremes that for the bulk of Americans neither path is palatable.

So what does all this have to do with the lottery? It is a fascinating juxtaposition of these issues. As the jackpot grew, millions of Americans were willing to shell out one to hundreds of dollars for the minuscule chance to become a mega-millionaire. Contribution to the lottery was justified because there was the possibility that they could be the one who would win it all. No one forced them; in fact, most people were positively giddy about the opportunity of winning and the chance to free themselves of ever having another financial concern. Yet, the suggestion that everyone would pay into a system that would guarantee health care for all who need it, in hopes that it would never be them, seems to be akin to sidling up to the devil himself. Why is it so easy to open our pocketbooks for the slim chance to be a millionaire and yet we are revolted by the notion of contributing to health care for those who may need more of it than they can afford-including ourselves?

Which brings us to an important insight into our national psyche, and perhaps that of most human beings, we don't like to be told what to do and we don't like to feel as if we don't have a choice. The Affordable Health Care Law has become the punching bag of the right over this issue alone. Any time someone unfurls the banner of "government good" the right goes after it like a dog with a bone.

So how does health care become like the lottery, where people actually want to participate? In a word-leadership.

While the intricacies of how to accomplish this cannot be detailed in a single article, the strategy of getting there is straightforward. Leadership is about helping people reconcile their conflicting beliefs so that individual values are aligned and are shared throughout communities. Because elected officials fear this challenging conversation, they would rather deal with the details of who pays for what, when and how rather than working with the public to get to a point where everyone can see the benefits, personally and societally of a well-functioning health care system.

Ask anyone and they will be able to come up with a list of obvious ways to improve health care. It is a system where no one, other than the insurance executives and their shareholders, are satisfied. Before we can get to the concrete work of improving the quality of what is offered, it is important to come to a fundamental understanding and agreement to the facts listed at the beginning of this article. Without an agreement around the basics and a reconciliation of the desire to "get government out of my life" while wanting the benefits of living in a well-functioning society we will never get anywhere.

Regardless of the Supreme Court's decision in June to uphold the health care law or not, we will still be a long way from true change-and with a good majority of the country enraged by the pronouncement. Without a leader willing to engage in a substantive dialogue our health care system will continue to deteriorate.

Perhaps the best we can do is to keep buying those lottery tickets hoping we are the lucky winner who needn't every worry about health care costs. Or maybe we can feel good about building a system where everyone contributes what they can in hopes they will never need it and knowing it will be there if they do. Now that's a lottery where everyone wins.

Kathleen Schafer is at the forefront of leadership development with more than 20 years experience. Grounded in the rough and tumble world of politics, experienced in business, honed in academia and broadened by her own journey to create a balanced life, she brings remarkable insights on how individuals can develop their leadership potential to successfully create productive and fulfilling lives. Kathleen's personal presence in one-on-one coaching, seminars, and keynote presentations transforms people's perspective on what they can accomplish and how to walk it in the real world everyday. Her leadership tools are simple, easy to understand allow you to quickly integrate them into your life, starting now!

If you are interested in creating change in your life, your organization or your community, please visit http://www.leadershipconnection.net/ for additional resources, podcasts, on-line courses, and tools to start your leadership journey today.


View the original article here

The Health Nazis - "No Soup Kitchens for You!"

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

A few odd stories have surfaced in the news recently which caught my attention, all involving the feeding of the homeless. Evidently there is a movement underway by local governments to curb donations of food supplies to soup kitchens. At first I dismissed it as an obscure story, but when I saw it recur in different places including New York, Philadelphia, Dallas, Nashville, and elsewhere, I knew something was underfoot.

Local departments of health have become concerned about the dietary requirements of the homeless and want to control their salt, sugar, fat and fiber intake. Their analysis of the soup kitchens contends the homeless are not getting the proper nutrition and, consequently, the Health Nazis have passed legislation prohibiting food donations thereby forcing a lot of kitchens to close their doors and turn the homeless away from their establishments.

Charitable organizations who have historically provided free food to kitchens are stumped by the legislation, including churches, synagogues, scouting, and other groups. Government do-gooders think they know better and want to expand the Nanny state by dictating the food to be distributed. This of course represents another instance of government expanding into our lives. Inevitably, a new layer of bureaucracy will be created to oversee soup kitchen operations and provide the necessary food, all at the expense of the taxpayers. Frankly, the general public is perplexed why the government is getting involved in this matter as it was funded by donations by people who see it as their civic duty to help those less fortunate than themselves. Instead of thanking them for their contributions though, the government appears bent on complicating their lives by mandating how they will help. In other words, the homeless have become pawns in government expansion.

This caused me to wonder, if I go to a restaurant and offer a friend a bite of my sandwich, would I be in violation of the law? Probably as I didn't first check his socio-economic status and the nutritional content of the sandwich which undoubtedly will not be up to government code.

Frankly, this is another fine example of Parkinson's law in government whereby, "Work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion." In other words, they are expanding their duties and responsibilities simply to look busy and responsible. In reality, they should just butt-out. The homeless probably eat better at the soup kitchens than before they were homeless.

All of this is just as ridiculous as another report I read from the United Kingdom whereby grade schools there have adopted programs prohibiting children from having best friends. Instead, they must all play together as a group. The intent is to prohibit the emotional distress of losing a friend in the event a child moves away or goes to another class. I understand a lot of English parents are becoming "emotionally distressed" themselves over the knuckleheads running the schools over there.

Don't you just love government sanctioned Socialism?

Tim Bryce is a writer and management consultant located in Palm Harbor, Florida.
http://www.timbryce.com/

He can be contacted at: timb001@phmainstreet.com
Copyright © 2012 Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.


View the original article here

The Affordable Health Care Law, Aka ObamaCare, Isn't

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Sometimes I think the US traveled back in a time warp as our government attempts to control and intervene in every aspect of our lives. ObamaCare is a prime example, but if it is allowed to stay then I really fear things to come. For instance, everyone would be required to report everything they eat, how much exercise they do, and this would complete our society as that of the Borg. A nanny state, where the government becomes your parents in adulthood, this you'd just have to accept. Somehow, however, that really doesn't sound like the USA I know. Okay so, let's talk.

There was an interesting piece of propaganda produced by the Pew Research, a Law Firm neo-Liberal Socialist Lobbying Group, on March 26, 2012 titled; "Public Remains Split on Health Care Bill, Opposed to Mandate - Polling on Health Care Reform." It had all sorts of nifty graphics, polls, and such claiming that 47% of the people were for it, and 45% against it. Still, that is irrelevant because it is unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court is to judge this law purely on the constitutional merits, or in this case lack of.

Thus, it doesn't matter what the mindless masses think they want this week on Twitter or Facebook, what matters is the law. Our Supreme Court has a job to do, which isn't legislating socialist reforms or injecting their personal political views, or keeping their high-paid spouses happy who have consulting gigs in the health care industry.

If the Supreme Court will not do its job, may I ask why we need them? The answer is; we don't - let's just turn our country over to the demands of the mob, and their socialist populist savior who continually usurps our constitution. The integrity of the United States system of government, checks and balances, and future are at stake.

The US Citizen for the most part has no idea of all the changes which will take place, nor any clues as to the unintended consequences they will cause regarding this law. To call it; The Affordable Health Care Law is almost criminal in itself, obviously something affordable sounds like a good idea, so of course the ignorant masses would be at least 50% or in this case 47% for it, but those polls by Pew are worthless. First the questions they ask in the poll are leading, secondly, the people don't understand, the population has been snowed by podium pushing politicians.

Apparently, the socialist elitists want to control your entire life from birth to death. Indeed, I hope you will please consider all this and think on it.

Lance Winslow has launched a new provocative eBook on Current US Politics. Lance Winslow is a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the Online Think Tank; http://www.worldthinktank.net/


View the original article here